Loading...
Sector · Recruitment
We build AI for recruitment that parses CVs, drafts adverts and books interviews, while a recruiter reviews every shortlist and every rejection.
In focus →
Where the line sits
A single vacancy can bring in hundreds of applications, most of which need the same admin.
AI for recruitment is good at that admin.
It can format CVs, draft job adverts, answer candidate questions and fill interview diaries.
It is much riskier when it starts deciding who gets through.
We build AI recruiting tools that speed up the work and leave every judgement about a candidate with a recruiter.

What the AI handles
What the recruiter owns
Where it helps
With AI for recruitment, the quickest wins sit in admin, not in selection.
The REC’s guidance on using AI in recruitment points to note taking, CV formatting, better CRM searches and automated data collection.
It also warns against putting sensitive or confidential information into free AI tools.
We connect AI to the systems you already use, so it works inside your ATS or CRM rather than in a separate chat window.
Shortlists are suggestions with reasons attached, and a recruiter accepts, edits or rejects them.
If your in-house team also wants help beyond hiring, see our page on AI for HR.
Illustrative batch with a typical confidence spread. Your real split comes from a pilot on your own work. Some decisions go to a person whatever the score.
What the regulator found
In November 2024 the ICO published the outcomes of its audits of AI sourcing, screening and selection tools.
The ICO’s audit outcomes report found some tools let recruiters filter out candidates with certain protected characteristics.
Others inferred gender and ethnicity from a candidate’s name instead of asking them.
Some collected far more personal information than they needed.
The ICO made almost 300 recommendations to providers, which were accepted or partially accepted.
Recruiters using these tools still carry their own data protection and equality duties.
Buying a tool from a provider does not hand those duties to the provider.
Buying and running tools
DSIT’s Responsible AI in recruitment guidance says to assign who is accountable for an AI system and to create methods for escalation.
It recommends piloting a tool with a diverse range of users before it goes live.
It also says applicants should be told when AI is used, so they can ask for adjustments or contest an outcome.
We build those points into our AI for recruitment, with a recruiter reviewing every rejection before it is sent.
That protects candidates, and it protects your agency or employer brand when a decision is questioned.
Our AI assurance work can test a supplier’s tool against your own candidates before you commit.
DSIT’s Responsible AI in recruitment guidance says to assign who is accountable for an AI system and to create methods for escalation.
How it works
Each system ships with a named person accountable for what it does.
01
We walk through sourcing, screening, interview and offer, and mark which steps affect a candidate’s chances.
02
We agree where a recruiter must review, including every rejection and every shortlist.
03
We connect the AI to your ATS or CRM, with logs of what it suggested and what the recruiter decided.
04
We pilot on live roles, check outcomes across candidate groups and train your consultants before scaling.
Questions
Further reading
Keep reading
Next step
A 30-minute call. We map one workflow, what the AI could take, and where a person must stay in the loop.